You are here: Home Candidate Evaluations Previous Ratings 2009
Document Actions

2009 Candidate Evaluations

2009 Candidate Evaluations

ballot

The Municipal League has been rating candidates for public office since 1911 based on four criteria: Involvement, Effectiveness, Character and Knowledge. The League ratings are widely respected and provide the only independent non-partisan, non-agenda driven evaluation of candidates.

This year our volunteer citizen committees have evaluated 113 candidates for selected races. Candidate interviews and ratings were completed during June and July and ratings are now available to help voters make the very best choice in the primary and general elections.

You can view all candidates listed alphabetically here.


2009 County-wide Races

King County Executive

King County Assessor

Port of Seattle

 

2009 King County Council

Council Position Nine

 

2009 City Races

Auburn City Council      Auburn Mayor

Bellevue City Council

Federal Way City Council

Kent City Council      Kent City Mayor

Kirkland City Council

Renton City Council

Sammamish City Council

Seatac City Council

Seattle City Council    Seattle Mayor     Seattle City Attorney    Seattle School Board     

Shoreline City Council

 

Races Decided in the August 2009 Primary

Court of Appeals, Div 1, Dist 1


Races Decided in the February 2009 Special Election

King County Elections Director

 

 


About the Municipal League Ratings

The ratings aren't endorsements. They assess each candidate's potential to be effective in office and ability to serve the community.

Outstanding – Has made numerous outstanding contributions requiring skills related to the office, is a path-finding and respected leader, brings knowledge and creativity to issues facing the office.

Very Good – Makes significant contributions, is a skilled builder of consensus, inspires confidence in the way he/she would serve, is thorough and attentive to issues.

Good – Has been active and effective in many roles, is capable of moving people to productive action, has strong record of participation in problem solving, shows satisfactory commitment to tackling issues.

Adequate – Has a record of participation and interest, is effective on specific issues, has provoked questions about suitability as an office holder, will need significant time/energy to fill gaps in knowledge.

Not Qualified – Doesn't appear engaged, has a record that casts doubt on ability to be productive, hasn't demonstrated ability to deal with responsibilities of office, has narrow focus, inflexible attitude or is otherwise troubling.

 

More on the Ratings

 

Support our candidate work. Join the Muni League today!


Plone.org web by NPower Seattle