You are here: Home Candidate Evaluations Previous Ratings 2010 2010 Legislative Candidate Ratings
Document Actions

2010 Legislative Candidate Ratings


LEGISLATIVE CANDIDATE RATINGS  (CONTESTED RACES ONLY)


LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT: 1 | 5 | 11 | 3031 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 36 3739414345 | 47 | 48

Position                     

Candidate                

Rating              

Party

More Info

Legislative Dist. 1

State Rep. Pos. 1

Vince DeMiero
Sandy Guinn
Dennis Richter %
Dick Lapinski
Derek Stanford

Very Good
Good
Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Good

D
R
R
R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire
; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 1

State Rep. Pos. 2

Dave Griffin
Luis Moscoso
Heidi Munson %

Adequate
Good
Not Qualified

D
D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 5

State Rep. Pos. 1

Jay Rodne ~
Gregory Hoover

Very Good
Good

R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 5

State Rep. Pos. 2

David Spring
Dean Willard
Glenn Anderson ~

Adequate
Good
Very Good

D
D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 11

State Rep. Pos. 1

Sarah Wright +
Zack Hudgins ~

Insf Info to Rate
Outstanding 

I
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 11

State Rep. Pos. 2 

Bob Hasegawa ~
Jackie Moore
John Potter %

Very Good
Not Qualified
Not Qualified

D
I
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 30

State Rep. Pos. 1 

Mark Miloscia ~
Shawn Sullivan 

Very Good
Good

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist 30

State Rep. Pos. 2

Carol Gregory
Anthony Kalchik
Ed Barney *
Katrina Asay
Jerry Galland

Outstanding
Good
Adequate
Very Good
Not Qualified

D
R
R
R
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 30

State Senator

Tracey Eide ~
Tony Moore

Outstanding
Very Good

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 31

State Rep. Pos. 1 

Cathy Dahlquist
Peggy Levesque
Shawn Bunney %

Very Good
Good
Very Good

R
D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 31

State Rep. Pos. 2 

Patrick Reed
Daniel Geske
Christopher Hurst ~

Adequate
Not Qualified
Outstanding

R
R
I

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 31

State Senator

Raymond Bunk
Matt Richardson
Ron Weigelt
Pam Roach % ~

Very Good
Good
Good
Adequate

D
R
D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 32

State Rep. Pos. 1

Art Coday
Cindy Ryu
Doris McConnell

Good
Very Good
Adequate

R
D
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 32

State Rep. Pos. 2

Stan Lippmann
Gary Gagliardi
Ruth Kagi ~

Not Qualified
Adequate
Outstanding

D
R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 32

State Senator

Patty Butler
Maralyn Chase
David Baker

Very Good
Good
Very Good

D
D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 33

State Senator

Jack Michalek
Karen Keiser ~

Good
Very Good

R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 34

State Rep. Pos. 1

Eileen L. Cody ~
Ray Carter

Very Good
Adequate

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 34

State Rep. Pos. 2

Joe Fitzgibbon
Mike Heavey
Geoffrey McElroy %
Marcee Stone

Very Good
Good
Adequate
Good

D
D
I
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 36

State Rep. Pos. 2

Jill England
Mary Lou Dickerson ~

Not Qualified
Very Good

R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 36

State Senator

Leslie Klein
Jeanne Kohl-Welles ~

Not Qualified
Outstanding

R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 37

State Rep. Pos. 2

Eric Pettigrew ~
John Stafford

Outstanding
Good

D
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 37

State Senator

Adam Kline ~
Tamra Smilanich %

Outstanding
Good

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 41

State Rep. Pos. 1

Marcie Maxwell ~
Peter Dunbar

Good
Very Good

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 41

State Rep. Pos. 2

Stephen Strader %
Orion S. Webster
Judy Clibborn ~

Not Qualified
Not Qualified
Outstanding

R
I
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire
; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 41

State Senator

Steve Litzow
Randy Gordon ~

Very Good
Outstanding

R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 43

State Rep. Pos. 2

Frank Chopp ~
Kim Verde

Outstanding
Not Qualified

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 45

State Rep. Pos. 1

Roger Goodman ~
Kevin Haistings

Very Good
Good

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 45

State Rep. Pos. 2

Larry Springer ~
Mark Isaacs

Outstanding
Not Qualified

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 45

State Senator

Eric Oemig ~
Andy Hill

Very Good
Good

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 46

State Rep. Pos. 2

Beau Gunderson
Phyllis G. Kenney ~

Adequate
Very Good

I
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire
; Web

Legislative Dist. 47

State Rep. Pos. 1

Nancy Wyatt
Geoff Simpson ~
Mark Hargrove

Very Good
Adequate
Good

R
D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 47

State Rep. Pos. 2

Pat Sullivan ~
Rodrigo M. Yanez

Outstanding
Good

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 47

State Senator

Joe Fain
Claudia Kauffman ~

Outstanding
Very Good

R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 48

State Rep. Pos. 1

Diane Tebelius
Ross Hunter ~

Very Good
Very Good

R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 48

State Rep. Pos. 2

Philip L. Wilson
Deb Eddy ~

Not Qualified
Very Good

R
D

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

Legislative Dist. 48

State Senator

Rodney Tom ~
Gregg Bennett

Outstanding
Good

D
R

Questionnaire; Web
Questionnaire; Web

 Note: Contested races in the 39th Legislative District were not rated in 2010.

 

About the Municipal League Ratings

The ratings are not endorsements. They assess each candidate's potential to be effective in office and ability to serve the community.

  • Outstanding – Has made numerous outstanding contributions requiring skills related to the office, is a path-finding and respected leader, brings knowledge and creativity to issues facing the office.
  • Very Good – Makes significant contributions, is a skilled builder of consensus, inspires confidence in the way he/she would serve, is thorough and attentive to issues.
  • Good – Has been active and effective in many roles, is capable of moving people to productive action, has strong record of participation in problem solving, shows satisfactory commitment to tackling issues.
  • Adequate – Has a record of participation and interest, is effective on specific issues, has provoked questions about suitability as an office holder, will need significant time/energy to fill gaps in knowledge.
  • Not Qualified – Doesn't appear engaged, has a record that casts doubt on ability to be productive, hasn't demonstrated ability to deal with responsibilities of office, has narrow focus, inflexible attitude or is otherwise troubling.


Symbol Key

Incumbent
#  Declined to Interview 
+  Unable to Interview
% Declined to Participate
^  Unable to Participate
*  Unable to Contact


Plone.org web by NPower Seattle