You are here: Home Candidate Evaluations Previous Ratings 2011 Committee Rating Pages 2011 Federal Way City Council Candidate Ratings - General Elections
Document Actions

2011 Federal Way City Council Candidate Ratings - General Elections

An adaption of the Municipal League's Candidate Ratings based on the results of the 2011 August Primary

FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL RATINGS - General Elections


      Position    
      
      Candidate      
    
      Rating       
      
        More Info    
         
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 1
 
Jim Ferrell ~
 
 
Very Good
  
  Questionnaire ; Website   
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 3
 
Roger Flygare
 
 
Adequate
  
Questionnaire ; Website
 Federal Way City Council
Position No. 3 
 
Susan Honda
 
 
Very Good
  
Questionnaire ; Website
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 5 

Bob Celski


Good

Questionnaire ; Website
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 5 
 
Jack Dovey ~
 
 
Very Good
  
Questionnaire ; Website
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 7 
 
Dini Duclos ~
 
 
Outstanding
  
Questionnaire ; Website
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 7 
 
Keith Tyler
 
 
Adequate
  
Questionnaire ; Website

For a complete listing of the Municipal League's Candidate Ratings, including candidates from the 2011 August Primary, please Click Here

About the Municipal League Ratings

The ratings are not endorsements. They assess each candidate's potential to be effective in office and ability to serve the community.

  • Outstanding – Has made numerous outstanding contributions requiring skills related to the office, is a path-finding and respected leader, brings knowledge and creativity to issues facing the office.
  • Very Good – Makes significant contributions, is a skilled builder of consensus, inspires confidence in the way he/she would serve, is thorough and attentive to issues.
  • Good – Has been active and effective in many roles, is capable of moving people to productive action, has strong record of participation in problem solving, shows satisfactory commitment to tackling issues.
  • Adequate – Has a record of participation and interest, is effective on specific issues, has provoked questions about suitability as an office holder, will need significant time/energy to fill gaps in knowledge.
  • Not Qualified – Doesn't appear engaged, has a record that casts doubt on ability to be productive, hasn't demonstrated ability to deal with responsibilities of office, has narrow focus, inflexible attitude or is otherwise troubling.


Symbol Key

~  Incumbent
#  Declined to Interview 
+  Unable to Interview
% Declined to Participate
^  Unable to Participate
*  Unable to Contact

 

 


Plone.org web by NPower Seattle