2011 Federal Way City Council Candidate Ratings - General Elections
An adaption of the Municipal League's Candidate Ratings based on the results of the 2011 August Primary
FEDERAL WAY CITY COUNCIL RATINGS - General Elections
| Position |
Candidate |
Rating |
More Info |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 1
|
Jim Ferrell ~
|
Very Good |
Questionnaire ; Website |
|
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 3
|
Roger Flygare
|
Adequate |
Questionnaire ; Website |
|
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 3
|
Susan Honda
|
Very Good |
Questionnaire ; Website |
|
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 5
|
Bob Celski |
Good |
Questionnaire ; Website |
|
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 5
|
Jack Dovey ~
|
Very Good |
Questionnaire ; Website |
|
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 7
|
Dini Duclos ~
|
Outstanding |
Questionnaire ; Website |
|
Federal Way City Council
Position No. 7
|
Keith Tyler
|
Adequate |
Questionnaire ; Website |
For a complete listing of the Municipal League's Candidate Ratings, including candidates from the 2011 August Primary, please Click Here
About the Municipal League Ratings
The ratings are not endorsements. They assess each candidate's potential to be effective in office and ability to serve the community.
-
Outstanding – Has made numerous outstanding contributions requiring skills related to the office, is a path-finding and respected leader, brings knowledge and creativity to issues facing the office.
-
Very Good – Makes significant contributions, is a skilled builder of consensus, inspires confidence in the way he/she would serve, is thorough and attentive to issues.
-
Good – Has been active and effective in many roles, is capable of moving people to productive action, has strong record of participation in problem solving, shows satisfactory commitment to tackling issues.
-
Adequate – Has a record of participation and interest, is effective on specific issues, has provoked questions about suitability as an office holder, will need significant time/energy to fill gaps in knowledge.
-
Not Qualified – Doesn't appear engaged, has a record that casts doubt on ability to be productive, hasn't demonstrated ability to deal with responsibilities of office, has narrow focus, inflexible attitude or is otherwise troubling.
Symbol Key
~ Incumbent
# Declined to Interview
+ Unable to Interview
% Declined to Participate
^ Unable to Participate
* Unable to Contact
Outstanding – Has made numerous outstanding contributions requiring skills related to the office, is a path-finding and respected leader, brings knowledge and creativity to issues facing the office.
Very Good – Makes significant contributions, is a skilled builder of consensus, inspires confidence in the way he/she would serve, is thorough and attentive to issues.
Good – Has been active and effective in many roles, is capable of moving people to productive action, has strong record of participation in problem solving, shows satisfactory commitment to tackling issues.
Adequate – Has a record of participation and interest, is effective on specific issues, has provoked questions about suitability as an office holder, will need significant time/energy to fill gaps in knowledge.
Not Qualified – Doesn't appear engaged, has a record that casts doubt on ability to be productive, hasn't demonstrated ability to deal with responsibilities of office, has narrow focus, inflexible attitude or is otherwise troubling.
Symbol Key
# Declined to Interview
+ Unable to Interview
% Declined to Participate
^ Unable to Participate
* Unable to Contact

