Document Actions
2011 Port Commissioner / County Director of Elections Ratings
Port / Elections Ratings
PORT COMMISSIONER / COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE RATINGS
| Position |
Candidate |
Rating |
More Info |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seattle/King County Port Commission Position No. 2 |
Richard Pope *
|
Not Qualified |
Questionnaire ; Website |
| Seattle/King County Port Commission Position No. 2 |
Gael Tarleton ~
|
Outstanding |
Questionnaire ; Website |
| Seattle/King County Port Commission Position No. 5 |
Bill Bryant ~
|
Outstanding |
Questionnaire ; Website |
| Seattle/King County Port Commission Position No. 5 |
Dean Willard
|
Good |
Questionnaire ; Website |
| King County Director of Elections |
Mark Greene
|
Not Qualified |
Questionnaire ; Website |
| King County Director of Elections |
Sherril Huff ~
|
Very Good |
Questionnaire ; Website |
About the Municipal League Ratings
The ratings are not endorsements. They assess each candidate's potential to be effective in office and ability to serve the community.
-
Outstanding – Has made numerous outstanding contributions requiring skills related to the office, is a path-finding and respected leader, brings knowledge and creativity to issues facing the office.
-
Very Good – Makes significant contributions, is a skilled builder of consensus, inspires confidence in the way he/she would serve, is thorough and attentive to issues.
-
Good – Has been active and effective in many roles, is capable of moving people to productive action, has strong record of participation in problem solving, shows satisfactory commitment to tackling issues.
-
Adequate – Has a record of participation and interest, is effective on specific issues, has provoked questions about suitability as an office holder, will need significant time/energy to fill gaps in knowledge.
-
Not Qualified – Doesn't appear engaged, has a record that casts doubt on ability to be productive, hasn't demonstrated ability to deal with responsibilities of office, has narrow focus, inflexible attitude or is otherwise troubling.
Symbol Key
~ Incumbent
# Declined to Interview
+ Unable to Interview
% Declined to Participate
^ Unable to Participate
* Unable to Contact
Outstanding – Has made numerous outstanding contributions requiring skills related to the office, is a path-finding and respected leader, brings knowledge and creativity to issues facing the office.
Very Good – Makes significant contributions, is a skilled builder of consensus, inspires confidence in the way he/she would serve, is thorough and attentive to issues.
Good – Has been active and effective in many roles, is capable of moving people to productive action, has strong record of participation in problem solving, shows satisfactory commitment to tackling issues.
Adequate – Has a record of participation and interest, is effective on specific issues, has provoked questions about suitability as an office holder, will need significant time/energy to fill gaps in knowledge.
Not Qualified – Doesn't appear engaged, has a record that casts doubt on ability to be productive, hasn't demonstrated ability to deal with responsibilities of office, has narrow focus, inflexible attitude or is otherwise troubling.
Symbol Key
# Declined to Interview
+ Unable to Interview
% Declined to Participate
^ Unable to Participate
* Unable to Contact
Watch the 2012 Civic Awards thanks to King County TV
