You are here: Home Candidate Evaluations Previous Ratings 2011 Committee Rating Pages 2011 Renton City Council Candidate Ratings - General Elections
Document Actions

2011 Renton City Council Candidate Ratings - General Elections

An adaption of the Municipal League's 2011 Candidate Ratings as a result of the August Primary Elections

 

RENTON CITY COUNCIL RATINGS - General Elections


      Position    
      
      Candidate      
    
      Rating       
      
      More Info    
         
Renton City Council 
Position No. 3
 
Marcie Palmer ~
 
 
Outstanding
  
Questionnaire ; Website
Renton City Council 
Position No. 4

Sarah Sanoy-Wright +


Not Qualified
 
Questionnaire ; Website  
Renton City Council 
Position No. 4 
 
Gregory Taylor ~
 
 
Outstanding
  
Questionnaire ; Website
Renton City Council
Position No. 5 
 
Robin Jones
 
 
Very Good
  
Questionnaire ; Website
Renton City Council
Position No. 5
 
Ed Prince
 
 
Very Good
  
Questionnaire Website
 Renton City Council
Position No. 7  
 
Phyllis Forister
  
 
Good
  
Questionnaire ; Website
Renton City Council
Position No. 7
 
Donald Persson ~

 
Good

Questionnaire ; Website 

For a complete listing of the Municipal League's Candidate Ratings, including candidates from the 2011 August Primary Elections, please Click Here

 
About the Municipal League Ratings

The ratings are not endorsements. They assess each candidate's potential to be effective in office and ability to serve the community.

  • Outstanding – Has made numerous outstanding contributions requiring skills related to the office, is a path-finding and respected leader, brings knowledge and creativity to issues facing the office.
  • Very Good – Makes significant contributions, is a skilled builder of consensus, inspires confidence in the way he/she would serve, is thorough and attentive to issues.
  • Good – Has been active and effective in many roles, is capable of moving people to productive action, has strong record of participation in problem solving, shows satisfactory commitment to tackling issues.
  • Adequate – Has a record of participation and interest, is effective on specific issues, has provoked questions about suitability as an office holder, will need significant time/energy to fill gaps in knowledge.
  • Not Qualified – Doesn't appear engaged, has a record that casts doubt on ability to be productive, hasn't demonstrated ability to deal with responsibilities of office, has narrow focus, inflexible attitude or is otherwise troubling.


Symbol Key

~  Incumbent
#  Declined to Interview 
+  Unable to Interview
% Declined to Participate
^  Unable to Participate
*  Unable to Contact

 


Plone.org web by NPower Seattle